BF3 and us

User avatar
TygerBS
Senior Member
Posts: 1181
Joined: Wed Oct 24, 2007 6:05 pm
Location: Johannesburg

Re: BF3 and us

Post by TygerBS »

I think we shoulkd use the battle log voice.

1. It means we can have multiple channels for each squad, instead of the only 2 we have in TS.
2. It means we can play with other friends and members of the community, using TS means we cant.
3. Its more social.
4. BOOBS.
Image
s3xy_j0nny
Senior Member
Posts: 4046
Joined: Thu Oct 05, 2006 2:44 pm
Contact:

Re: BF3 and us

Post by s3xy_j0nny »

For pub server play, Battlelog is fine. For clannies, we must use TS. We have 4 channels now.
Image
From the darkness you must fall
Failed and weak, to darkness all.
User avatar
Megageth
Senior Member
Posts: 4367
Joined: Thu Oct 05, 2006 2:36 pm

Re: BF3 and us

Post by Megageth »

Everyone should set up TS properly with the the whisper function and test it.
Image
Stu
Senior Member
Posts: 2140
Joined: Mon Oct 09, 2006 2:29 pm

Re: BF3 and us

Post by Stu »

Re whisper functions - according to the Whisper lists you drag and drop the respective parties, that would mean at some stage we should all do a test on TS so we can get the right ppl in our respective Whisper lists?

What are the thoughts on the 8 man in one channel or split it per squad? thanks
[table]
[tr]
[td]
Image
[/td]
[td]
Image
[/td]
[/tr]
[/table]
Only a ninja can kill a ninja. Regular humans are useless against a ninja.
User avatar
TygerBS
Senior Member
Posts: 1181
Joined: Wed Oct 24, 2007 6:05 pm
Location: Johannesburg

Re: BF3 and us

Post by TygerBS »

Yip naturally for clannies TS all the way.

I just think we should get into the habit of making parties and using the features of battlelog
Image
Skouperd
Senior Member
Posts: 982
Joined: Thu Mar 05, 2009 1:57 pm
Location: Cape Town, Western Cape, South Africa
Contact:

Re: BF3 and us

Post by Skouperd »

why Tyger? TS is much better than battlelog? I would say just stick with TS.
[TABLE]
<tbody>[TR]
[TD]Image[/TD]
[/TR]
</tbody>[/TABLE]

Scientific fact, dried testicles of rhino poachers can cure aids.
User avatar
Hubris
Senior Member
Posts: 922
Joined: Wed Oct 06, 2010 10:21 pm
Location: Centurion, Gauteng

Re: BF3 and us

Post by Hubris »

I reckon if the game is 8 players on a side or less, use TeamSpeak. Otherwise, each squad should use a Battlelog party and the squad leaders should use a second PTT key for Teamspeak amongst each other and the captain. Could take some practice, but I think it could be good for larger games.
[table][tr]
[td]
Image
[/td]
[td]
Image
[/td]
[/tr][/table]
User avatar
Megageth
Senior Member
Posts: 4367
Joined: Thu Oct 05, 2006 2:36 pm

Re: BF3 and us

Post by Megageth »

I've had problems with Battlelog as I believe have others. Teamspeak has 4 channels with whisper enabled so you can speak to everyone.
I am strongly against using Battlelog for matches.
Image
User avatar
NiteShade
Senior Member
Posts: 2486
Joined: Fri Oct 06, 2006 7:03 pm
Location: Edenvale, Gauteng, South Africa, South Africa

Re: BF3 and us

Post by NiteShade »

Battlelog for public play is key if one wants to be social with non-grrr members. However, for clannies its definitely gotta be TS.
Image
duiwel
Member
Posts: 41
Joined: Tue Feb 15, 2011 6:31 am

Re: BF3 and us

Post by duiwel »

I vote TS as well due to the buggy nature of Battlelog. I know for some players it is not an issue but I have had countless issues with BLog (Disconnections, unable to join parties, chats not being delivered etc.) Maybe this will change in future when/if EA irons out all the bugs :P
Image

Return to “[grrr] BF3 - General Discussion”

×