by Hubris » Mon Jan 16, 2012 6:02 pm
Alright... my idea was to eliminate Metro, I think it's just one of those maps played into the ground giving rise to artificial skill. Every clan and his auntie know how to play this map and take it to the extreme. I just don't see this map playing to our strength (experience). But hey, if we have some good debate for it I'll reconsider.
Generally, I think we have the advantage on Karkand maps because the Assault Conquest game mode pretty much defines our play style (sometimes impatient!). I also don't think many teams have really prepared for them so it could give us an advantage - or end up being excluded right away which would suck bone.
I think we need to play Damavand and Tehran against good opposition and choose one. That would leave us with Karkand, Sharqi, Bazaar, Seine and one more BF3. Any thoughts? I know Bazaar has been a toughie for us, but I just have this feeling it will turn out to be a great map for us (like Seine).
Alright... my idea was to eliminate Metro, I think it's just one of those maps played into the ground giving rise to artificial skill. Every clan and his auntie know how to play this map and take it to the extreme. I just don't see this map playing to our strength (experience). But hey, if we have some good debate for it I'll reconsider.
Generally, I think we have the advantage on Karkand maps because the Assault Conquest game mode pretty much defines our play style (sometimes impatient!). I also don't think many teams have really prepared for them so it could give us an advantage - or end up being excluded right away which would suck bone.
I think we need to play Damavand and Tehran against good opposition and choose one. That would leave us with Karkand, Sharqi, Bazaar, Seine and one more BF3. Any thoughts? I know Bazaar has been a toughie for us, but I just have this feeling it will turn out to be a great map for us (like Seine).