System upgrade write-up – November 2009
Posted: Wed Nov 11, 2009 9:27 pm
Okay, now that I’m almost finished with my PC upgrade (there are a couple of bits still outstanding - I’ll cover these later), I thought that it’s about time that I wrote a report on the build and results that I’m getting.
It’s been almost three and a half years since I last upgraded the ‘core’ of my PC (motherboard, CPU and RAM). I typically do system rebuilds every two years, so this is quite a long time for me, and I therefore decided to make up for it by giving myself a really expansive budget for the upgrade, effectively building a top of the line system - saving money only where additional expenditure just wasn’t cost justifiable at all. An example of this was the CPU I bought – I got the Intel i7-920 where the top of the line is the i7-975 (at three times the price but not a huge amount more performance).
I replaced most of the components of the PC, the only exceptions being the case, my water cooling kit, and my graphics card (I upgraded this about a year ago).
This article will be fairly detailed, so I'll post it in a number of sections, covering different aspects of the process. A word of caution, this is a long article. I got a little carried away when writing it!!
You have been warned...

Part I: System architecture – a tough choice right now
As mentioned previously, my objective with this build was not to get the best price to performance ratio, but rather to build a high end system, utilising the best components I could find within reason. My budget was very high for this; the total cost of all of the bits that I’ve bought will be close to R30K (based on dealer prices from Frontosa – thanks to Denis ‘Skouperd’ Dell for letting me purchase all of my new toys on his account).
The first decision that I had to make was the age old AMD/Intel one. What architecture would my system be based on? I decided fairly early on that Intel was the way to go, because of the fact that they do have the faster architecture at this juncture, albeit at a bit of a price premium (although not as much as you might think). As it stands, at stock speeds, the bottom of the range i7-920 is faster than the top of the range Phenom2 965 Black Edition in most tests (although this benefit is admittedly marginal when it comes to performance in games).
At this stage, I must say that AMD’s Phenom offering is a very good one, price to performance wise it’s a great investment. Unfortunately, they just can’t compete with Intel at the highest level at the moment. Hopefully that will change with their next architecture release, Intel needs someone to put pressure on them again. Also, I can’t simply look at performance at stock speeds. I always look to overclock my CPU’s (hence the watercooling setup), so the amount of headroom the CPU has for overclocking is important to me when selecting a CPU. Currently, Intel i7 CPUs seem to have more range than the Phenoms, as will be illustrated later in this article.
So I was set on an Intel platform for the build. Job done, i7-920 is the way to go. Except... about a month before I put my purchase plan into action, Intel went and muddied the waters by releasing the ‘new’ i7 and i5 range, based on a different socket to the 920 (socket 1156 instead of 1366). To make my decision tougher, initial reviews showed the new i7 860 (priced about the same as the 920) to be as fast, if not faster than the 920 in gaming tests. This combined with cheaper motherboard options, and dual channel instead of triple channel RAM would mean equivalent performance, at a lower total cost of ownership.
After a fair amount of research, I went with my original choice, the i7-920. My decision was made for the following reasons:
• Future upgradeability – The socket 1366 platform is Intel’s ‘Performance’ architecture. Their new high end CPU ranges will be launched to this platform, not socket 1156.
• Triple channel RAM support – The Triple channel memory controller gives higher memory bandwidth, as well as giving me what I believe is the ideal amount of RAM for a 64bit system right now – 6GB (3x2GB memory modules). Using the dual channel setup, I’d be forced to go with either 4GB or 8GB.
• PCI Express x16 lanes – The socket 1156 platform has no Northbridge at all. Not only is the memory controller brought on-board the CPU (as with all i7’s), but now they have brought the PCI-E controller on board as well. This controller is currently limited to 16 lanes, meaning that a crossfire or SLI setup would be limited to 2x8, rather than 2x16. Although I currently don’t run dual card setup, I’d like to keep my options open. EDIT: It's a good thing that I did consider this, as I'm now running a dual graphics card setup!!
• Chipset maturity – I built my previous system at the same time that Intel originally launched the Core2 architecture. My CPU, the E6600 was one of the original Core2Duo processors on the market. At the time that I bought it, supporting chipsets were limited, and this resulted in me buying the best I could at the time (an Intel 975 chipset), which ultimately limited me in terms of overclocking capability. Socket 1366 has been around for about a year now, and motherboards and their respective BIOS versions are stable. Socket 1156, being new, is somewhat untested, and I’d much rather go with something that I know to be good.
So now I had chosen the architecture for my system upgrade, next I had to start choosing the components...
It’s been almost three and a half years since I last upgraded the ‘core’ of my PC (motherboard, CPU and RAM). I typically do system rebuilds every two years, so this is quite a long time for me, and I therefore decided to make up for it by giving myself a really expansive budget for the upgrade, effectively building a top of the line system - saving money only where additional expenditure just wasn’t cost justifiable at all. An example of this was the CPU I bought – I got the Intel i7-920 where the top of the line is the i7-975 (at three times the price but not a huge amount more performance).
I replaced most of the components of the PC, the only exceptions being the case, my water cooling kit, and my graphics card (I upgraded this about a year ago).
This article will be fairly detailed, so I'll post it in a number of sections, covering different aspects of the process. A word of caution, this is a long article. I got a little carried away when writing it!!
You have been warned...


Part I: System architecture – a tough choice right now
As mentioned previously, my objective with this build was not to get the best price to performance ratio, but rather to build a high end system, utilising the best components I could find within reason. My budget was very high for this; the total cost of all of the bits that I’ve bought will be close to R30K (based on dealer prices from Frontosa – thanks to Denis ‘Skouperd’ Dell for letting me purchase all of my new toys on his account).
The first decision that I had to make was the age old AMD/Intel one. What architecture would my system be based on? I decided fairly early on that Intel was the way to go, because of the fact that they do have the faster architecture at this juncture, albeit at a bit of a price premium (although not as much as you might think). As it stands, at stock speeds, the bottom of the range i7-920 is faster than the top of the range Phenom2 965 Black Edition in most tests (although this benefit is admittedly marginal when it comes to performance in games).
At this stage, I must say that AMD’s Phenom offering is a very good one, price to performance wise it’s a great investment. Unfortunately, they just can’t compete with Intel at the highest level at the moment. Hopefully that will change with their next architecture release, Intel needs someone to put pressure on them again. Also, I can’t simply look at performance at stock speeds. I always look to overclock my CPU’s (hence the watercooling setup), so the amount of headroom the CPU has for overclocking is important to me when selecting a CPU. Currently, Intel i7 CPUs seem to have more range than the Phenoms, as will be illustrated later in this article.
So I was set on an Intel platform for the build. Job done, i7-920 is the way to go. Except... about a month before I put my purchase plan into action, Intel went and muddied the waters by releasing the ‘new’ i7 and i5 range, based on a different socket to the 920 (socket 1156 instead of 1366). To make my decision tougher, initial reviews showed the new i7 860 (priced about the same as the 920) to be as fast, if not faster than the 920 in gaming tests. This combined with cheaper motherboard options, and dual channel instead of triple channel RAM would mean equivalent performance, at a lower total cost of ownership.
After a fair amount of research, I went with my original choice, the i7-920. My decision was made for the following reasons:
• Future upgradeability – The socket 1366 platform is Intel’s ‘Performance’ architecture. Their new high end CPU ranges will be launched to this platform, not socket 1156.
• Triple channel RAM support – The Triple channel memory controller gives higher memory bandwidth, as well as giving me what I believe is the ideal amount of RAM for a 64bit system right now – 6GB (3x2GB memory modules). Using the dual channel setup, I’d be forced to go with either 4GB or 8GB.
• PCI Express x16 lanes – The socket 1156 platform has no Northbridge at all. Not only is the memory controller brought on-board the CPU (as with all i7’s), but now they have brought the PCI-E controller on board as well. This controller is currently limited to 16 lanes, meaning that a crossfire or SLI setup would be limited to 2x8, rather than 2x16. Although I currently don’t run dual card setup, I’d like to keep my options open. EDIT: It's a good thing that I did consider this, as I'm now running a dual graphics card setup!!
• Chipset maturity – I built my previous system at the same time that Intel originally launched the Core2 architecture. My CPU, the E6600 was one of the original Core2Duo processors on the market. At the time that I bought it, supporting chipsets were limited, and this resulted in me buying the best I could at the time (an Intel 975 chipset), which ultimately limited me in terms of overclocking capability. Socket 1366 has been around for about a year now, and motherboards and their respective BIOS versions are stable. Socket 1156, being new, is somewhat untested, and I’d much rather go with something that I know to be good.
So now I had chosen the architecture for my system upgrade, next I had to start choosing the components...
. This is the first ROG motherboard I’ve owned, and in my opinion it’s well worth the price premium.
)






. I opened the article to find that the new firmware I had downloaded and used has caused failure on a number of SSD’s, to the extent that Intel have removed the firmware from their website and have strongly encouraged all users who have not updated yet to hold back and not do so. The firmware was available for one day, and it just happened to be the same day that I built my PC. I have been lucky. My drive was fine, and I’ve noticed no adverse effects so far (touch wood). Intel have said that the problem either happens immediately or not at all, so I should be okay. Apparently the issue mostly happens when people already had Win7 64bit installed on the drive. Thankfully I decided to flash before installing Windows!!