Page 5 of 5
Re: =DAC=Crusaders Clan Match
Posted: Sat Jan 29, 2011 7:47 am
by Paul
Ha ha the games when to BigDaddy because DAC used illegal weapons
Regarding the DAC vs bigdaddy game, DAC played very well. Unfortunately one of their players made use of a banned weapon, which was recorded, and thus the game is awarded to bigdaddy. (Do Gaming admin has confirmed, I will be forwarding emails)
Sorry about this, but rules are rules.
-sArge
You can check it out on the same link that j0nny gave above
Re: =DAC=Crusaders Clan Match
Posted: Sat Jan 29, 2011 8:04 am
by s3xy_j0nny
ke ke ke ke ke.
Re: =DAC=Crusaders Clan Match
Posted: Sat Jan 29, 2011 8:09 am
by Paul
I wonder how long the guy used the ban weapon, I know rules are rules but when you get pomped that badly and only 1 dude was using a banned weapon (and I am sure not the whole match) , then I doubt it made much of a difference.
I think Bigdaddy are being opportunistic and not playing in the spirit of the game. It does count in out favor though, so we will take it.
Re: =DAC=Crusaders Clan Match
Posted: Sat Jan 29, 2011 10:44 am
by flycatchr
i understand what you are saying Paul - but if someone breaks the rules, you need to draw a line, and the line is that the rule was broken - otherwise there will be grey areas that peeps will take advantage of and use to their own gain and continually justify it just because they can.
Re: =DAC=Crusaders Clan Match
Posted: Sat Jan 29, 2011 3:48 pm
by s3xy_j0nny
IRF used ninja pyjamas (read: specact kits) against us, and they're banned. Granted we pomped them anyways so it wasn't an issue, but I posted on SGS to say exactly what Paul mentioned: 1 player using the AN-94 (which has been nerfed into a kak gun) is not the sole contributing factor to getting pomped 500+ tickets to love. Taking a vicotry from there is not in the spirit of the game.