You are in the same application process as Reaper is, you may NOT ask questions. You chop :banghead::clap::D
Printable View
Thanks Jack,
1. Cause he is a douche, but he can take it.
2. See above. He makes dumbass remarks that only he and that dirt between your toes understands.
3. Cause they make awesome sandwiches!!!!!
4. I assume this country... Umm, good question. Not very creative but scrap the damn etolls!!!! And no bra day every friday!!!
Alright, let me take a stab at this one.
If you layer 10x10 = 100 balls.
next layer will be between the other balls, now the question is what percent you take the ball sinks lower. Gonna take 33%.
new layer is now 9x9 = 81 balls but you gain 33% space per 1cm layer.
so, 181 balls per 1.66cm layer.
5cm / 1.66cm = 3
3 * 181balls = 543 balls
Reaper:
If you had the opportunity to teach your child that red was blue and blue was red would you?
Your first layer is stacked 10x10... interesting.
have you considered stacking your first layer in the following format:
10 then 9 then 10 then 9 then 10 then 9 then 10.... doing it that way, means you can fit in an extra row on the bottom layer thereby increasing the total bottom layer to 105 balls instead of the 100 you've mentioned. The question is what do you do with the second layer... ;-)
By the way, the mathematics to calculate the height of a second layer is quite cool in it's own right (you just "assumed" 33%). I.e. 2 balls on the bottom layer with the top layer inbetween. Versus 3 balls in a triangle shape on the bottom with the second layer lying inbetween the 3 balls, versus 4 balls in a square with the top layer sitting between them. The really cool one to calculate is if you have 5 balls in a ring shape on the bottom and you put the second layer on top of that one. As a matter of interest, if you have 6 balls on the bottom layer making a ring, then the space in the middle is big enough for a ball to actually sit inside the middle.
But no, short answer, I have calculated a much bigger number than what you and Morhp have thusfar came up with.
Hallo Carl.
1. Are you running a 1JZ Turbo motor in your Supra?
2. If so, why. If not, why.
3. Did you grow tired of V-tech's?
4. What is the Supra kicking out at the moment?
5. Was Antidote indeed hacking? :p
Nice having you here.
Hey Dante,
1. Currently its the 2JZ-GE motor but dropped it off this morning for the transplant to happen. Putting in the 2JZ-GTE motor.
2. 1JZ require modification to the engine mounts as well as a new bellhousing on the W58 box. 2JZ-GTE is direct bolt-in
3. Traded it in on the Focus ST, alot that helped hey.
4. Currently with the old motor, about 160HP at the wheels. New motor, looking for 430HP at the wheels.
5. Thats a good question, i say no. LOL
Lekker!