by J_Th4ng » Fri Oct 15, 2010 2:13 pm
I guess I should be apologising here, being as I was the one who wrote the article, including all of the chimp references.
Paul, if this genuinely upset you, then I'm sorry for that. That was never my intent. Having said that, the chimp references have always been public discussion points, in fact you and j0nny go at it on teh SGS forums all the time in that regard.
Secondly, I posted the entire content of my response on the forum, asking for editting and comment. All that you provided was the usual 'I am your god' kind of edits that you normally put in there. Because of those, and the fact thatt here was no mention of the chimp references, I assumed that you were cool with the article as it was.
Damnit man, if it bugged you, you should've said something beforehand, not after it was published.
I guess I should be apologising here, being as I was the one who wrote the article, including all of the chimp references.
Paul, if this genuinely upset you, then I'm sorry for that. That was never my intent. Having said that, the chimp references have always been public discussion points, in fact you and j0nny go at it on teh SGS forums all the time in that regard.
Secondly, I posted the entire content of my response on the forum, asking for editting and comment. All that you provided was the usual 'I am your god' kind of edits that you normally put in there. Because of those, and the fact thatt here was no mention of the chimp references, I assumed that you were cool with the article as it was.
Damnit man, if it bugged you, you should've said something beforehand, not after it was published.